Critical review essay guidelines

During the New Deal, liberals recognized that the ballot box and elected branches are generally the appropriate engines of social reform, and liberals used both to spectacular effect — instituting profound social changes that remain deeply ingrained in society today. In the face of great skepticism about the constitutionality of New Deal measures in some corners, a generation of Democratic-appointed judges, from Louis Brandeis to Byron White, argued for judicial restraint and deference to the right of Congress to experiment with economic and social policy. Those voices have been all but forgotten in recent years among liberal activists. It would be a very good thing for all involved — the country, an independent judiciary, and the Left itself — if liberals take a page from David von Drehle and their own judges of the New Deal era, kick their addiction to constitutional litigation, and return to their New Deal roots of trying to win elections rather than lawsuits.

Develop a thesis. Your thesis is your central argument, and your entire paper should be based upon your thesis. A strong thesis gives specific information about the topic you're addressing as well as your primary arguments. Give your primary reasons for your arguments and, if you are responding to a text, a brief statement of the author's arguments. For example, you might argue, "Kant argues that ethics are based on a categorical imperative, but this categorical imperative does not provide guidance for all ethical dilemmas." This statement provides a succinct summation of the argument and hints at the direction the paper will take.

Critical review essay guidelines

critical review essay guidelines

Media:

critical review essay guidelinescritical review essay guidelinescritical review essay guidelinescritical review essay guidelines